Effect of Bovine Lactoferrin and Casein Peptide Powder on Microbial Growth and Glucose Utilization by Microorganisms in Pork Meat During Storage at 4oC

Authors

  • Liliane Clarisse Umuhumuza State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214122, Jiangsu Province, People`s Republic of China
  • Niu Wei-Min Wuxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
  • Xiulan Sun State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214122, Jiangsu Province, People`s Republic of China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.208.213

Keywords:

Freshness, glucose content, meat, milk protein, preservatives, shelf-life

Abstract

In this research, the effect of Lactoferrin and Casein peptide on antimicrobial activities and glucose utilization by microorganisms in hot-boned (4-5 h after death) pork meat during storage at 4oC for five days was examined. Total plate count was lower for sample with added Lactoferrin and Casein peptide than control sample. Meat sample with added Lactoferrin had lower plate count than sample with added Casein peptide. High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was also used to detect pork meat glucose also known as freshness index of meat and the results showed that glucose content increased during storage from day 1 to day 3 then slightly decreased at day 5 with the addition of Lactoferrin and Casein peptide and the differences were not significant (p<0.05), however it was found to decrease during storage for control sample. The addition of Lactoferrin and Casein peptide decreased the bacterial counts at days 0, 1, 3 and 5 and increased glucose content during storage of hot-boned pork meat at 4oC.

Downloads

Published

15.02.2011

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Umuhumuza, L. C., Wei-Min, N., & Sun, X. (2011). Effect of Bovine Lactoferrin and Casein Peptide Powder on Microbial Growth and Glucose Utilization by Microorganisms in Pork Meat During Storage at 4oC. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10(3), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.208.213