The Most Preferred and Tasty Fish in Zambia: A Case Study of Three Copperbelt Province Markets

Authors

  • Diana Malumbe Box 4461, Luanshya, Zambia
  • Confred G. Musuka The Copperbelt University, School of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 21692, Kitwe, Zambia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2013.960.965

Keywords:

Bream (Tilapia), copperbelt, fish, fish trading, Zambia

Abstract

A research was conducted in three districts (Luanshya, Ndola and Kitwe) of the mineral-rich Copperbelt Province, from 1st May to 30th June 2012 to determine the most preferred and tasty fish on the market through administration of questionnaires to randomly selected respondents. The study also examined the different types of fish found on the market at any given time. A total of 130 questionnaires were administered, 40 to traders and 30 to consumers in each of the three districts. Slightly over forty-seven per cent (47.50%) of the respondents indicated that the Bream, was most preferred fish species among consumers, while 30, 10 and 10% preferred Buka buka (Luciolates spp.), Kapenta (Limnothrissa spp.) and Mintesa (Mormyrids). A further 62.5% of the respondents felt that fresh fish was most preferred form on the market, as 62% of the consumers purchased more of fresh than dry fish. Over and above, 67.5% of the fish sold on the market had good taste, with the tasty preference for bream being 37%. Fish traders were also aware of the fact that stocking the right species preferred by customers helped to improve on the marketing strategy, thereby increasing on their net returns. It was further noted that 58% of the traders ventured into fish trading to earn a living, 32% due to lack of formal employment, while 5%, as a result of family tradition and another 5% considered it as good business.

References

CSO., 2010. Government of Zambia, 2010 census. Central Statistics Office, Government of Zambia, Lusaka.

National Aquaculture Development Plan, 2010. Overcoming the slow growth of aquaculture in Zambia 2010-2015. Department of Fisheries, Chilanga, pp: 1-153.

Fox, K.A., 1992. Structural Analysis and the Measurement of Demand for Farm Products. In: Demand Analysis, Econometrics and Policy Models: Selected Writings, Johnson, S.R., J.K. Sengupta and E. Thobecke (Eds.). Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA., pp: 39-49.

Koc, B., E. Dagistan, M.G. Akpinar, M. Gul, Y. Yilmaz and Y. Mazlum, 2009. Determining household preferences for fish consumption with conjoint analysis in Turkey. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 2215-2222.

Kaunda, E., D. Maliro, M. Mphepo, S. Khaila, L. Kamanga, A. Mwangwela and O. Chapotoka, 2003. Chambo: Is it taste or something else?: Preference and acceptability of roasted, fried and boiled Oreochromis spp., (Chambo), Rhamphochromis spp. (Ncheni) and Bagrus meridionalis (Kampango) from Lake Malawi. Aqua Fish Techn. Rep., 2: 6-9.

Quagrainie, K.K., M. Fahie, K. Hughes and A. Xing, 2008. An assessment of ethnic market opportunities for Indiana farm raised fish. Final Report. http://southcenters.osu.edu/sites/southc/files/site-library/site-documents/dirmark/ISALiveFishMarketReport.pdf.

Dalhatu, M. and A.L. Ala, 2011. Fish preference among residents of Sokoto Metropolis, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Pak. J. Social Sci., 8: 132-134.

Mwango, J., M. Chilala and C. Bweupe, 1999. Analysis of Aquaculture Development in Zambia. MAFF, Lusaka, Pages: 27.

Hishamunda, N. and P. Manning, 2001. Promotion of sustainable commercial aquaculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: Investment and economic feasibility. FAO Fisheries Technical paper 408/2, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Ajana, A.M., 1999. Overview of highlight and problems of fisheries extension in Nigeria. Proceedings of the NIOMER During a Workshop on Improvement of Fisheries Extension in March 12-16, 1999, NIOMER, Ibadan, pp: 22.

Downloads

Published

15.10.2013

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Malumbe, D., & Musuka, C. G. (2013). The Most Preferred and Tasty Fish in Zambia: A Case Study of Three Copperbelt Province Markets. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 12(11), 960–965. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2013.960.965