Research Article Open Access

Evaluation of Yeast Supplementation with Urea-Molasses in Rice Straw-Based Diets on in vitro Ruminal Fermentation

Authors

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
A.I.M. Ali
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sriwijaya, Jl. Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir, Sumatera Selatan, 30662, Indonesia
|
S. Sandi
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sriwijaya, Jl. Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir, Sumatera Selatan, 30662, Indonesia
|
Riswandi
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sriwijaya, Jl. Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir, Sumatera Selatan, 30662, Indonesia
|
A. Imsya
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sriwijaya, Jl. Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, Ogan Ilir, Sumatera Selatan, 30662, Indonesia
|
A. Prabowo
South Sumatra Agricultural Institute for Assessment Technology, Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian (BPTP), Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
|
N. Rofiq
Agency for The Assessment and Application of Technology, Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi, (BPPT), Indonesia
Published on: November 15, 2015
DOI 10.3923/pjn.2015.988.993
PDF

Abstract

The effects of yeast supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of rice straw and urea-molasses diets in Indonesian swamp buffalo were examined; five doses of yeast (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 g/head/d) were tested. The results indicated that yeast supplementation increased dry and organic matter, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), cellulose and hemicellulose degradability, ammonia-nitrogen and total volatile fatty acid concentration and decreased the ruminal pH but had no effect on acid detergent fiber (ADF) degradability or cellulolytic bacterial or protozoan populations. Supplementation with yeast supported ruminal fermentation of urea-molasses and rice straw-based diets, with 5.0 g yeast/head/d showing the greatest response for most variables tested.

Keywords:

Cellulolytic bacterial and protozoan populations, degradability, yeast

Article Metrics

111 Abstract Views
118 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Evaluation of Yeast Supplementation with Urea-Molasses in Rice Straw-Based Diets on in vitro Ruminal Fermentation on PlumX

How to Cite

Ali, A., Sandi, S., Riswandi, Imsya, A., Prabowo, A., & Rofiq, N. (2015). Evaluation of Yeast Supplementation with Urea-Molasses in Rice Straw-Based Diets on in vitro Ruminal Fermentation. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 14(12), 988–993. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2015.988.993
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Akter, Y., M.A. Akbar, M. Shahjalal and T.U. Ahmed, 2004. Effect of urea molasses multi-nutrient blocks supplementation of dairy cows fed rice straw and green grasses on milk yield, composition, live weight gain of cows and calves and feed intake. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 7: 1523-1525.
2.
Ali, A.I.M., S. Sandi, Muhakka, Riswandi and D. Budianta, 2013. The grazing of pampangan buffaloes at non tidal swamp in south sumatra of Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2013 3rd International Conference on Asia Agriculture and Animal, July 27-28, 2013, Moscow, Russia.
3.
AOAC., 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
4.
Bach, A., S. Calsamiglia and M.D. Stern, 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci., 88: E9-E21.
5.
Conway, E.J., 1962. Micro Diffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error Imprint. 5th Edn., Crosky Lookwood and Sons Ltd., London, UK.
6.
Dolezal, P., J. Dvoracek, J. Dolezal, J. Cermakova, L. Zeman and K. Szwedziak, 2011. Effect of feeding yeast culture on ruminal fermentation and blood indicators of Holstein dairy cows. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 80: 139-145.
7.
Doyle, P.T., C. Devendra and G.R. Pearce, 1986. Rice Straw as a Feed for Ruminants. Universities and Colleges Ltd., Canberra, Australia.
8.
General Laboratory Prosedures, 1966. Department of Dairy Science. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
9.
Herawaty, R., N. Jamarun, M. Zain, Arnim and R.W.S. Ningrat, 2013. Effect of supplementation Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Leucaena leucocephala on low quality roughage feed in beef cattle diet. Pak. J. Nutr., 12: 182-184.
10.
Hungate, R.E., 1969. A Roll Tube Method for Cultivation of Strict Anaerobes. In: Methods in Microbiology, Norris, J.R. and D.W. Ribbons (Eds.). Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 117-132.
11.
Hoover, W.H., 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci., 69: 2755-2766.
12.
Hristov, A.N., G. Varga, T. Cassidy, M. Long and K. Heyler et al., 2010. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on ruminal fermentation and nutrient utilization in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 682-692.
13.
Kumar, D.S., S. Prasad and R.M.V. Prasad, 2013. Effect of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on ruminal microbial population in buffalo bulls. Buffalo Bull., 32: 116-119.
14.
Lila, Z.A., N. Mohammed, T. Yasui, Y. Kurokawa, S. Kanda and H. Itabashi, 2004. Effects of a twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Sci., 82: 1847-1854.
15.
Lynch, H.A. and S.A. Martin, 2002. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture and Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 2603-2608.
16.
Mao, H.L., H.L. Mao, J.K. Wang, J.X. Liu and I. Yoon, 2014. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on in vitro fermentation and microbial communities of low-quality forages and mixed diets. J. Anim. Sci., 91: 3291-3298.
17.
Newbold, C.J., R.J. Wallace, X.B. Chen and F.M. McIntosh, 1995. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 1811-1818.
18.
Ogimoto, K. and S. Imai, 1981. Atlas of Rumen Microbilogy. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo.
19.
Opsi, F., R. Fortina, S. Tassone, R. Bodas and S. Lopez, 2012. Effects of inactivated and live cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro ruminal fermentation of diets with different forage: Concentrate ratio. J. Agric. Sci., 150: 271-283.
20.
Shriver, B.J., W.H. Hoover, J.P. Sargent, R.J. Crawford Jr. and W.V. Thayne, 1986. Fermentation of a high concentrate diet as affected by ruminal pH and digesta flow. J. Dairy Sci., 69: 413-419.
21.
Sung, H.G., Y. Kobayashi, J. Chang, A. Ha, I.H. Hwang and J.K. Ha, 2007. Low ruminal pH reduces dietary fiber digestion via reduced microbial attachment. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., 20: 200-207.
22.
Tang, S.X., G.O. Tayo, Z.L. Tan, Z.H. Sun and L.X. Shen et al., 2008. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws. J. Anim. Sci., 86: 1164-1172.
23.
Tanwar, P.S., Y. Kumar and R.S. Rathore, 2013. Effect of Urea Molasses Mineral Block (UMMB) supplementation on milk production in buffaloes under rural management practices. J. Rural Agric. Res., 13: 19-21.
24.
Zhiliang, T., C. Huiping and X. Tingxian, 1996. Comparative study of fiber characteristics of rice and wheat straws. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., 9: 51-56.
25.
Thalib, A., J. Bestari, Y. Widiawati, H. Hamid and D. Suherman, 2000. Effect of rice straw silage treated with rumen microbes of buffalo on digestibility and ecosystem of cattle rumen. Jumal Ilmu Temak Veteriner, 5: 1-6, (In Indonesian).
26.
Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry, 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci., 18: 104-111.
27.
Thu, N.V. and P. Uden, 2000. Effect of work and urea-molasses cake supplementation on live weight and milk yield of murrah buffalo cows. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., 13: 1329-1336.
28.
Van Thu, N. and P. Uden, 2001. Effect of urea-molasses cake supplementation of swamp buffaloes fed rice straw or grasses on rumen environment, feed degradation and intake. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 14: 631-639.
29.
Tiwari, S.P., U.B. Singh and U.R. Mehra, 1990. Urea molasses mineral blocks as a feed supplement: Effect on growth and nutrient utilization in buffalo calves. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 29: 333-341.
30.
Trach, N.X., 1998. The need for improved utilisation of rice straw as feed for ruminants in Vietnam: An overview. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 10.
31.
van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
32.
Vu, D.D., L.X. Cuong, C.A. Dung and P.H. Hai, 1999. Use of urea-molasses-multinutrient block and urea-treated rice straw for improving dairy cattle productivity in Vietnam. Prev. Vet. Med., 38: 187-193.
33.
BPS., 2012. Produksi paditahun 2011. Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS), Jakarta, Indonesia.