Detection of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from Local Breed Chicken Gut as Probiotic Agent in Livestock


Authors

  • Arlene Debbie Lingoh Department of Animal Sciences and Fishery, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Nyabau Road 97008, Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Sui Sien Leong Department of Animal Sciences and Fishery, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Nyabau Road 97008, Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Shahrul Razid Sarbini Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Nyabau Road 97008, Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2020.197.203

Keywords:

Bacterial isolates, chicken gut, lactic acid bacteria, potential probiotics, poultry husbandry

Abstract

Background and Objective: Farmers are still improving growth and feed efficiency using feed-additive antibiotics in livestock although it has been banned due to food safety. The urgent need to search for probiotics as a beneficial microbial feed supplement to replace antibiotics is therefore crucial. This study was conducted to identify and characterize the potential probiotic features of lactic acid bacteria(LAB) from the gut of local breed chickens. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five samples were collected from the crop, gizzard, small intestine, large intestine, caecum of the chickens from different regions of Borneo, Malaysia. The bacteria were identified phenotypically (Gram staining, biochemical tests) and genotypically by (GTG)5 PCR fingerprinting. The probiotic characteristics of LAB were studied using fermentation (1% glucose) and bile tolerance (0.2, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0%). Results: About one hundred presumptive LAB with Gram-positive, catalase-negative, non-motile properties were obtained from 25 samples. Genotypic (GTG)5 fingerprinting indicated three main clusters as shown in the dendrogram. However, only 7 isolates showed high survival rate and able to ferment glucose under gut condition, indicating their potential as probiotics agents in poultry husbandry with no adverse health consequences. Conclusion: Our study proposed the use of these LAB isolates from the gut of local chicken breed as potential probiotics agents to enhance the immunity and growth in the chicken.

References

Skarp, C.P.A., M.L. Hanninen and H.I.K. Rautelin, 2016. Campylobacteriosis: The role of poultry meat. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 22: 103-109.

Chang, H.S., 2007. Overview of the world broiler industry: Implications for the Philippines. Asian J. Agric. Dev., 4: 67-82.

Shin, B. and W. Park, 2018. Zoonotic diseases and phytochemical medicines for microbial infections in veterinary science: Current state and future perspective. Front. Vet. Sci., Vol. 5.

Allen, H.K., U.Y. Levine, T. Looft, M. Bandrick and T.A. Casey, 2013. Treatment, promotion, commotion: antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends Microbiol., 21: 114-119.

Mungroo, N.A. and S. Neethirajan, 2014. Biosensors for the detection of antibiotics in poultry industry—A review. Biosensors, 4: 472-493.

Salim, H.M., H.K. Kang, N. Akter, D.W. Kim and J.H. Kim et al., 2013. Supplementation of Direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 92: 2084-2090.

Aliyu, A.B., A.A. Saleha, A. Jalila and Z. Zunita, 2016. Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, Vol. 16.

Dhama, K., S.K. Khurana, K. Karthik, R. Tiwari, Y.P.S. Malik and R.S. Chauhan, 2014. Panchgavya: Immune-enhancing and therapeutic perspectives. J. Immunolol. Immunopathol., 16: 1-11.

Alloui, M.N., W. Szczurek and S. Swiatkiewicz, 2013. The usefulness of prebiotics and probiotics in modern poultry nutrition: A review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 13: 17-32.

Aliakbarpour, H.R., M. Chamani, G. Rahimi, A.A. Sadeghi and D. Qujeq, 2012. The Bacillus subtilis and lactic acid bacteria probiotics influences intestinal mucin gene expression, histomorphology and growth performance in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 1285-1293.

Ritzi, M.M., W. Abdelrahman, M. Mohnl and R.A. Dalloul, 2014. Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge Poult. Sci., 93: 2772-2778.

Kaewiad, K., S. Kaewnopparat and N. Kaewnopparat, 2014. In vitro comparison of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum SK54 isolated from new born baby with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103. Adv. Mat. Res., 1060: 215-218.

Scheler, O., N. Pacocha, P.R. Debski, A. Ruszczak, T.S. Kaminskia and P. Garstecki, 2017. Optimized droplet digital CFU assay (ddCFU) provides precise quantification of bacteria over a dynamic range of 6 logs and beyond. Lab Chip, 17: 1980-1987.

Sien, L.S., S. Lihan, L.T. Yee, C.H. Chuan and L.C. Koon, 2013. Isolation and characterization of antibiotic resistant bacteria from swiftlet feces in swiftlet farm houses in Sarawak, Malaysia. Microbiol. Indones., 7: 137-143.

Sien, L.S., C.H. Chuan, S. Lihan and L.T. Yee, 2013. Isolation and identification of airborne bacteria inside swiftlet houses in Sarawak, Malaysia. Makara J. Sci., 17: 104-108.

Shakoor, G., A. Akbar, A. Samad, S.A. Khan and F.U. Rehman et al., 2017. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from chicken gut and its probiotic potential characterization. Int. J. Biosci., 11: 1-9.

Yegani, M. and D.R. Korver, 2008. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult. Sci., 87: 2052-2063.

Rinttila, T. and J. Apajalahti, 2013. Intestinal microbiota and metabolites-implications for broiler chicken health and performance. J. Applied Poult. Res., 22: 647-658.

Walter, J., 2008. Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: Implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 74: 4985-4996.

Wang, L., M. Fang, Y. Hu, Y. Yang, M. Yang and Y. Chen, 2014. Characterization of the most abundant Lactobacillus species in chicken gastrointestinal tract and potential use as probiotics for genetic engineering. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 46: 612-619.

Albazaz, R.I. and E.B. Buyukunal Bal, 2014. Microflora of digestive tract in poultry. KSU J. Nat. Sci., 17: 39-42.

Azad, M.A.K., M. Sarker, T. Li and J. Yin, 2018. Probiotic species in the modulation of gut microbiota: An overview. Biomed. Res. Int., Vol. 2018.

Mandal, H., R. Jariwala and T. Bagchi, 2015. Isolation and characterization of lactobacilli from human faeces and indigenous fermented foods for their potential application as probiotics. Can. J. Microbiol., 62: 349-359.

Oh, Y.J. and D.S. Jung, 2015. Evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus and Pediococcus strains isolated from Omegisool, a traditionally fermented millet alcoholic beverage in Korea. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 63: 437-444.

Kandola, S., U.V.S. Teotia, R. Kumar, A.K. Mishra and A. Singh, 2016. Investigation of acid tolerance attribute of various Lactobacillus casei group strains. Indian J. Anim. Res., 50: 190-193.

Manini, F., M.C. Casiraghi, K. Poutanen, M. Brasca, D. Erba and C. Plumed-Ferrer, 2016. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wheat bran sourdough. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 66: 275-283.

Handa, S. and N. Sharma, 2017. In vitro probiotic potential of Lactobacillus delbreuckii subsp. bulgaricus F18 isolated from homemade butter. Microbiology, 86: 143-149.

Ehrmann, M.A., P. Kurzak, J. Bauer and R.F. Vogel, 2002. Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J. Applied Microbiol., 92: 966-975.

Downloads

Published

15.03.2020

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Lingoh, A. D., Leong, S. S., & Sarbini, S. R. (2020). Detection of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from Local Breed Chicken Gut as Probiotic Agent in Livestock. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 19(4), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2020.197.203