Research Article Open Access

Assessment of Various Growth, Yield and Nutritional Parameters of Tomatoes as Affected by Farmyard Manure Fortified with Potassium Fertilizer

Authors

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Qudrat Ullah Khan
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Rafiq Ahmad
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
M. Jamil
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Obaidullah Sayal
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Asif Latif
Department of Horticulture, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Abdulaziz Khakwani
Department of Agronomy, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Ghazanfarullah Khan
Department of Agronomy, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Malik Muhammad Hashim
Department of Food Science and Technology, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Muhammad Mamoon-ur-Rashid
Department of Entomology, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
|
Muhammad Parvez
Department of Food Science and Technology, Gomal University, D.I. Khan, Pakistan
Published on: November 15, 2013
DOI 10.3923/pjn.2013.1066.1069
PDF

Abstract

To investigate the effect of different levels of potassium fertilizer with and without use of Farmyard Manure (FYM) on growth, yield and nutrition of tomato a study was carried out in year 2011 in pots. FYM was kept as main plots with five treatments of potassium (0, 60, 90, 120 and 160 kg K2O/ha) replicated four time. The results indicated that application of FYM and various K levels had significant effect on the growth, yield and nutrient content of tomatoes. The highest yield of tomatoes was (39.05 t/ha) observed in the pots receiving FYM and 41.97 t/ha was found in the treatment receiving K @ 120 kg/ha. The growth parameters including number of flowers per plant, number of fruits per plant and fruit diameter were also found significantly different by the application of FYM and K fertilizer. The mineral nutrition of tomato showed significant effect of FYM and K levels on plant P and K. FYM and K levels also significantly improved soil K content. It may be concluded that the Potassium applied @ 120 kg/ha along with the FYM was effective in improving the tomatoes attributes as well soil K content.

Keywords:

Farm yard manure, potassium, soil properties, tomatoes

Article Metrics

142 Abstract Views
105 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2013 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Assessment of Various Growth, Yield and Nutritional Parameters of Tomatoes as Affected by Farmyard Manure Fortified with Potassium Fertilizer on PlumX

How to Cite

Khan, Q. U., Ahmad, R., Jamil, M., Sayal, O., Latif, A., Khakwani, A., Khan, G., Hashim, M. M., Mamoon-ur-Rashid, M., & Parvez, M. (2013). Assessment of Various Growth, Yield and Nutritional Parameters of Tomatoes as Affected by Farmyard Manure Fortified with Potassium Fertilizer. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 12(12), 1066–1069. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2013.1066.1069
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Akhtar, M.E., M.T. Saleem and M.D. Stauffer, 2003. Potassium in Pakistan agriculture. Pakistan Agriculture Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp: 80
2.
Akhtar, M.E., A. Sardar, M. Ashraf, M. Akhtar and M.Z. Khan, 2003. Effect of potash application on seed cotton yield and yield components of selected cotton varieties-I. Asian J. Plant Sci., 2: 602-604.
3.
Anonymous, 2008. Pakistan fertilizer related statistics. National Fertilizer Development Centre (NFDC), Islamabad, Pakistan.
4.
Bertand, H., C. Touraine and J.C. Cleyetmarel, 2008. Stimulation on the ionic transport system in tomato plants. Can. J. Microbio., 66: 922-930.
5.
Blake, G.R. and K.H. Hartge, 1986. Bulk Density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Klute, A. (Ed.). 2nd Edn., ASA. and SSSA., Madison, WI., USA., pp: 363-375.
6.
Dhanorkar, B.A., D.K. Borkar, R.B. Puranik and R.P. Joshi, 1994. Forms of soil potassium as influenced by long-term application of FYM and NPK in vertisol. J. Potassium Res., 10: 42-48.
7.
Fontes, P.C.R., R.A. Sampaio and F.L. Finger, 2000. Fruit size, mineral composition and quality of trickle irrigated tomatoes as affected by potassium rates. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 35: 21-25.
8.
Kaur, N. and D.S. Benipal, 2006. Effect of crop residue and farmyard manure on K forms on soils of long term fertility experiment. Ind. J. Crop Sci., 1: 161-164.
9.
Kandil, H. and N. Gad, 2010. Response of tomato plants to sulphur and organic fertilizer. Int. J. Acad. Res., 2: 204-210.
10.
Lester, G.E., J.L. Jifon and W.M. Stewart, 2007. Foliar potassium improves cantaloupe marketable and nutritional quality. Better Crops, 91: 24-25.
11.
Majumdar, S.P., R.L. Meena and G.D.S. Baghel, 2000. Effect of levels of compaction and potassium on yield and quality of tomato and chilli crops grown on highly permeable soils. J. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 215-220.
12.
Pujos, A. and P. Morard, 1997. Effects of potassium deficiency on tomato growth and mineral nutrition at the early production stage. Plant Soil, 189: 189-196.
13.
Meaza, M., T. Seyoum and K. Woldetsadik, 2007. Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 15: 149-159.
14.
Mohsen, A.A., 2006. Studies on the effect of bio organic and chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of tomato under sandy soil conditions. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt.
15.
Nelson, D.W. and L.E. Sommers, 1983. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (Eds.)., 2nd Edn., ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI., USA, pp: 539-579.
16.
Ahmad, N. and M. Rashid, 2003. Fertilizers and their use in Pakistan. NDFC, FAO, Islamabad, Pages: 112.
17.
Oborn, I., Y. Andrist-Rangel, M. Askekaard, C.A. Grant, C.A. Watson and A.C. Edwards, 2005. Critical aspects of potassium management nin agricultural systems. J. Soil Use Manage., 21: 102-112.
18.
Pettigrew, W.T., 2008. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol. Plant., 133: 670-681.
19.
Rao, H.M. and T.R. Subramanian, 1991. Effect of potassium application on the yield and content of K, Ca and Mg in cabbage, okra, tomato and beetroot. J. Potash Res., 7: 190-197.
20.
Ryan, J., G. Estefan and Abdul Rashid, 2001. Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual. 2nd Edn., ICARDA, Syria, Pages: 172.
21.
Tel, D.A. and M. Hagarty, 1984. Soil and Plant Analysis. IITA Ibadan/University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, pp: 277.
22.
Tonfack, L.B., A. Bernadac, E. Youmbi, V.P. Mbouapouognigni, M. Ngueguim and A. Akoa, 2009. Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on tomato vigor, yield and fruit composition under tropical andosol soil conditions. Fruits, 64: 167-177.

Most read articles by the same author(s)