Optimation Formula of Goat Milk Yoghurt and White Oyster Mushroom Powder with Mixture Design Methods

Authors

  • Yulianti Fitri Kurnia Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Sedarnawati Yasni Department of Food Science and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Budi Nurtama Department of Food Science and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2014.296.302

Keywords:

Goat milk, lactid acid bacteria, mixture design, mushroom, yoghurt

Abstract

Yoghurt is a product of fermented milk using lactic acid bacteria as a starter. As a probiotics, Lactobacillus achidophillus was applied in the making of symbiotic yoghurt with white oyster mushroom powder as a prebiotic source. The objective of this research was to optimize goat milk yoghurt formula by mixture design with three component (white oyster mushroom, skim milk and skim goat milk) and four responses (pH, viscosity, total titrated acid and lactid acid bacteria). The result indicated that the optimum formula was a mixture of 0.5% white oyster mushroom, 3% skim milk and 96% goat skim milk. The optimum formula low pH, high viscosity and high total lactic acid bacteria. Lastly, the optimum formula was further modified by adding spices syrup as a topping (made from ginger extract, mixture extract of cloves-cardamom-anise and mixture extract of cloves-cardamom-anise) in a different volume of addition (2, 4 and 6 mL) with serving size of 100 mL goat milk yoghurt. These hedonic test result showed that the highest score of the taste properties were 4.37 for 4 mL addition of ginger syrup; 4.13 for 6 mL addition of mixture of cloves-cardamom-anise syrup and 4.23 for 6 mL addition of mixture of cloves-cardamom-cinnamon syrup. Based on these results, the consumer’ preference was still at the level of netral rather like.

References

Aryana, K.J. and P. McGrew, 2007. Quality attributes of yogurt with Lactobacillus casei and various prebiotics. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 40: 1808-1814.

Aswal, P., S. Priyadarsi and S. Anubha, 2012. Yoghurt: Preparation, characteristic and recent advancements. Cibtech J. Bioprotocols, 1: 32-44.

AOAC, 1999. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edn., Vol. 2, Chapter 41, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Barrionuevo, M., M.J.M Alferez, I.L. Aliaga, M.R.S. Sampelayo and M.S. Campos, 2002. Beneficial effect of goat milk on nutritive utilization of iron and copper in malabsorption syndrome. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 657-664.

Boycheva, S.T. Dimitrov, N. Naydenova and G. Mihaylova, 2011. Quality characteristic of yoghurt from goat's milk, supplemented with fruit juice. Czech J. Food Sci., 29: 24-30.

Cahyanti, A.N., 2011. Viability of the lactobacillus casei probiotic in yoghurt from goat milk during frozen storage. J. Teknol. Pertanian, 12: 176-180.

Chen, M.J., K.N. Chen and C.W. Lin, 2003. Optimization of the growth rate of probiotics in fermented milk using genetic algorithms and sequential quadratic programming techniques. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 16: 894-902.

Haenlein, G.F.W., 2004. Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Rumin. Res., 51: 155-163.

Lourens-Hattingh, A. and B.C. Viljoen, 2001. Yogurt as probiotic carrier food. Int. Dairy J., 11: 1-17.

Park, Y.W., 2007. Rheological characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminent Res., 68: 73-87.

Usmiati, S., W. Broto and H. Setiyanto, 2011. Characteristic of cow milk dadih using starter of probiotic of lactic acid bacteria. JITV, 16: 140-152.

Wirawati, C.U. and D.E. Nirmagustina, 2009. In vivo study of cereal product from rice bran and sweet potato flour as functional. Jurnal Teknologi Industri dan Hasil Pertania, 14: 142-147.

Downloads

Published

15.04.2014

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Kurnia, Y. F., Yasni, S., & Nurtama, B. (2014). Optimation Formula of Goat Milk Yoghurt and White Oyster Mushroom Powder with Mixture Design Methods. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 13(5), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2014.296.302