Research Article
Open Access
Comparative Study of Biochemical Properties of Non-Conventional Plant Sources to Prepare Low Cost Fish Feed
Abstract
Biochemical analysis of non-conventional plant sources, Bermuda Grass, Nursery Grass (sages), Typha and Maize Spike (without grains) was done to determine the nutritional value to replace conventional sources such as rice bran, wheat bran and rice polish to prepare low cost fish feed. Analysis was carried out in the research lab of Institute of Biochemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro. It was observed that Bermuda grass and Nursery grass (sagas) have good protein value as 2.84 and 10.97, respectively. It is also observed that these non-conventional plants are a good source of energy and easily available around the year.
Keywords:
Bermuda grass, biochemical analysis, sagesArticle Metrics
109
Abstract Views
100
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Sahito, M. A., Ansari, I. T., Narejo, N. T., Suheryani, I., Waryani, B., Ansari, Z. A., & Noor-ul-Ain, N. (2015). Comparative Study of Biochemical Properties of Non-Conventional Plant Sources to Prepare Low Cost Fish Feed. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 14(7), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2015.431.435
References
1.
Abdulrazak, S.A., R.W. Muinga, W. Thorpe and E.R. Orskov, 1997. Supplementation with Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala on voluntary food intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and live weight of crossbred steers offered Zea mays stover. Livest. Prod. Sci., 49: 53-62.
2.
De Aguiar, E.M., G.F. da Costa Lima, M.V.F. dos Santos, F.F.R. de Carvalho, A. Guim, H.R. de Medeiros and A.Q. Borges, 2006. Yield and chemical composition of chopped tropical grass hays. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 35: 2226-2233.
3.
Ahmed, F.A. and A.I. Ahmed, 1983. Intake and digestibility of berseem (Medicago sativa) and sorghum abu 70 (Sorghum vulgare) forages by Sudan Zebu cattle and desert sheep. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 15: 7-12.
4.
Arieli, A. and D. Werner, 1989. A comparison between fermentation heat of forages and organic matter digestibility determined by in vitro incubation with rumen fluid. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 23: 333-341.
5.
Babayemi, O.J. and M.A. Bamikole, 2007. Nutritive value of Tephrosia candida seed in West African dwarf goats. J. Central Eur. Agric., 7: 731-738.
6.
Butterworth, M.H., 1963. Digestibility trials on forages in Trinidad and their use in the prediction of nutritive value. J. Agric. Sci., 60: 341-346.
7.
Caceres, O. and J. Kalous, 1986. Nutritional value of tropical forage crops grown in Cuba.1. Differences between grass species. Sbornik Vysoke Skoly Zemedelskev Praze Fakulta Agronomicka B, 44: 297-309.
8.
Fulkerson, W.J., A. Horadagoda, J.S. Neal, I. Barchia and K.S. Nandra, 2008. Nutritive value of forage species grown in the warm temperate climate of Australia for dairy cows: Herbs and grain crops. Livestock Sci., 114: 75-83.
9.
Gowda, N.K., J.V. Rammana, C.S. Prasad and K. Sing, 2004. Micronutrient content of certain tropical conventional and unconventional feed resources of Southern India. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 36: 77-94.
10.
Harris, S.W. and W.H. Marshall, 1963. Ecology of water-level manipulations on a northern marsh. Ecology, 44: 331-343.
11.
Chander, J. and M.L. Madan, 1984. Studies on the growth of grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella (Val.) fed on cattle yard fodder waste under composite fish culture. J. Inland Fish. Soc. India, 16: 1-6.
12.
Keddy, P.A. and T.H. Ellis, 1985. Seedling recruitment of 11 wetland plant species along a water level gradient: Shared or distinct responses? Can. J. Bot., 63: 1876-1879.
13.
Khanum, S.A., T. Yaqoob, S. Sadaf, M. Hussain and M.A. Jabbar et al., 2007. Nutritional evaluation of various feedstuffs for livestock production using in vitro gas method. Pak. Vet. J., 27: 129-133.
14.
Kjeldahl, J., 1883. A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic matter. Z. Anal. Chem., 22: 366-382.
15.
Krueger, N.A., A.T. Adesogan, C.R. Staples, W.K. Krueger, D.B. Dean and R.C. Littell, 2008. The potential to increase digestibility of tropical grasses with a fungal, ferulic acid esterase enzyme preparation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 145: 95-108.
16.
Nasrullah, M.N., R. Akashi and O. Kawamura, 2003. Nutritive evaluation of forage plants grown in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 16: 693-701.
17.
Ohlde, G. and K. Becker, 1982. Suitability of cell-wall constituents as predictors of organic matter digestibility in some tropical and subtropical by-products. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 7: 191-199.
18.
Do Prado, I.N., F.B. Moreira, L.M. Zeoula, F.Y. Wada, I.Y. Mizubuti and C.A. Neves, 2004. In situ dry matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber degradability of some grasses in continuous grazing. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33: 1332-1339.
19.
Rashid, M.H., S.M. Rahmatullah and M.R. Amin, 1996. Preparation of low cost feed for cage culture of pangus Pangasius sutchi (Fowler). Bangladesh J. Fish., 19: 45-52.
20.
Richard, D., H. Guerin and F.S. Toure, 1989. Feeds of the Dry Tropics (Senegal). In: Ruminant Nutrition, Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables, Jarrige, R. (Ed.). INRA and John Libbey Eurotext, London, Paris, pp: 325-345.
21.
Roa, V.M.L., J.R. Barcena-Gama, M.S. Gonzalez, M.G. Mendoza, C.M.E. Ortega and B.C. Garcia, 1997. Effect of fiber source and a yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae1026) on digestion and the environment in the rumen of cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 64: 327-336.
22.
Sanaullah, A.A.S.M., M.A. Mazid, M.A. Rahman, S. Gheyasuddin and S.C. Chakraborty, 1986. Formulation of quality fish feeds from indigenous raw materials and their effects on the growth of cat fish, Clarias batrachus. Bangladesh J. Fish., 9: 39-46.
23.
Shaheen, T.M., S. Ayub, S.Z. Hayat, A. Abidi and S. Tahir, 2000. Impact of different levels on the survival and growth of Labeo rohita at constant level of protein. Pak. J. Fish., 1: 95-102.
24.
Smith, S.G., 1962. Natural hybridization among five species of cattail. Am. J. Bot., 49: 678-678.
25.
Sultan, J.I., H. Nawaz and M. Yaqoob, 2007. Nutritive value of marginal land grasses of Northern grasslands of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 39: 1071-1082.
26.
Tisserand, J.L. and X. Alibes, 1989. Feeds of the Mediterranean Area. In: Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables, Jarrige, R. (Ed.). John Libbey Eurotext, London, Paris, ISBN: 9780861962471, pp: 305-324.
27.
Webster, C.D., H.H. Tidwell and D.H. Yancey, 1992. Effect of protein level and feeding frequency on growth and body composition of cage-reared channel catfish. Progressive Fish Culturist, 54: 92-96.
28.
Xande, A., R. Garcia-Trujillo and O. Caceres, 1989. Feeds of the Humid Tropics (West Indies). In: Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables, Jarrige, R. (Ed.). John Libbey Eurotext, London, Paris, ISBN: 9780861962471, pp: 347-363.
