Consumers' Meat and Products Consumption Frequency, Knowledge Levels and Quality Cues: The Sample of Aksehir, Turkey

Authors

  • Sumeyra S. Tiske Inan Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karamanoglu Mehmet Bey University, Karaman, Turkey
  • Ebru Bayrak Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Services, Mevlana University, Konya, Turkey
  • M. Ali Cebirbay Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Science, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
  • Nazan Aktas Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Science, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2016.540.546

Keywords:

Consumption, knowledge, meat, meat products, quality cues

Abstract

Meat contains a wide range of important dietary source of proteins and essential nutrients which provide a positive effect on human growth and development. The quality of meat and meat products differ from intrinsic and extrinsic cues so that it can be formed according to preferences of consumers. The aim of this study is to determine the consumer’s consumption frequency, knowledge levels and opinion of quality cues of meat and meat products. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional, general survey model. The sample group of the study consisted of 402 consumers who were selected using easy randomized sampling method. The survey instrument consists of demographic characteristics, consumption frequencies, knowledge level and quality cues of meat and meat products of consumers. According to the results, the participants’ once a week consumption frequencies of beef, mutton/lamb and goat meat were found 23.2, 5.2 and 1.0%, respectively and two-three times a week consumption frequencies of sucuk, pastrami, salami, sausage and braised meat were found 19.7, 1.2, 9.5 and 9.7%, respectively and 3.7% and significantly differences were determined between sucuk, sausage and braised meat (p<0.000, p<0.05, p<0.05) consumption frequencies by gender. The quality cues findings were separated to intrinsic and extrinsic factors (Cronbach α: 0.892). No difference between intrinsic quality items was detected (p>0.05), but extrinsic quality item scores were confirmed significantly differences by gender (p<0.000). The mean ( ± Sx) of the meat and meat product knowledge scores was determined (62.15±0.69) and the knowledge scores according to gender was determined significant (F(400): 7.455; p = 0.000).

References

Acebron, L.B. and D.C. Dopico, 2000. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Qual. Pref., 11: 229-238.

Atay, O., O. Gokdal, T. Aygun and H. Ulker, 2004. Red meat consumption habits in Cine, Aydın. 4th Edn., Suleyman Demirel Uni., Isparta, pp: 348-354.

Becker, T., E. Benner and K. Glitsch, 2000. Consumer perception of fresh meat quality in Germany. Brt. Food J., 102: 246-266.

Bozkurt, Y., M. Gul and G. Hiz, 2011. A review on consumer perception of organically produced red meat and meat quality. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Hum. St., 3: 497-502.

Bredahl, L., 2004. Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Qual. Pref., 15: 65-75.

Brunso, K., T.A. Fjord and K.G. Grunert, 2002. Consumers' food choice and quality perception. MAPP Working paper no. 77. The Aarhus School of Business, MAPP Centre, Aarhus, http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/32302886/wp77.pdf

Font-i-Furnols, M. and L. Guerrero, 2014. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci., 98: 361-371.

Gossard, M.H. and R. York, 2003. Social structural influences on meat consumption. Hum. Ecol. Rev., 10: 1-9.

Grunert, K.G., 1995. Food quality: A means-end perspective. Food Qual. Pref., 6: 171-176.

Grunert, K.G., 1997. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Qual. Pref., 8: 157-174.

Grunert, K.G., 2005. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 32: 369-391.

Grunert, K.G., 2006. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Sci., 74: 149-160.

Grunert, K.G., A. Baadsgaard, H.H. Larsen and T.K. Madsen, 1996. Market Orientation in Food and Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA., pp: 185-192.

Grunert, K.G., L. Bredahl and K. Brunso, 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-a review. Meat Sci., 66: 259-272.

Issanchou, S., 1996. Consumer expectations and perceptions of meat and meat product quality. Meat Sci., 43: 5-19.

Jacoby, J., J.C. Olson and R.A. Haddock, 1971. Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. J. App. Psychol., 55: 570-579.

Jae-Eun, C., P.Y. Jong and D.T. Pysarchik, 2006. Cue utilization to assess food product quality: A comparison of consumers and retailers in India. Int. Rev. Retail Distr. Consum. Res., 16: 199-214.

Karabudak, E., M. Bas and G. Kiziltan, 2008. Food safety in the home consumption of meat in Turkey. Food Control, 19: 320-327.

Karakup, K., T. Aygun and E. Alarslan, 2008. Consumption habits of meat in centre town of Gaziantep province. Yuzuncu Yil Univ. J. Agric. Sci., 18: 113-120.

Karly, B. and A. Bilgic, 2007. Factors affecting meat and meat products consumption quantities in Sanlyurfa province. Akdeniz Univ. J. Agric. Faculty, 20: 127-136.

Liu, H. and C. Deblitz, 2007. Determinants of beef consumption in China. Working Paper No. 41, Asian Agribusiness Research Centre (AARC), Charles Sturt University, December 2007, Australia

McAfee, A.J., E.M. McSorley, G.J. Cuskelly, B.W. Moss, J.M.W. Wallace, M.P. Bonham and A.M. Fearon, 2010. Red meat consumption: an overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Sci., 84: 1-13.

Ness, M.R., M. Ness, M. Brennan, E. Oughton, C. Ritson and E. Ruto, 2010. Modelling consumer behavioural intentions towards food with implications for marketing quality low-input and organic food. Food Qual. Pref., 21: 101-111.

Olson, J.C. and J. Jacoby, 1972. Cue utilization in the quality perception process. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference for Consumer Research. November 3-5, 1972, Association for Consumer Research, Chicago, USA, pp: 169-179.

Ophuis, P.A.M.O. and H.C.M. Van Trijp, 1995. Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Qual. Pref., 6: 177-183.

Steenkamp, J.B.E.M. and H.C.M. Van Trijp, 1996. Quality guidance: A consumer-based approach to food quality improvement using partial least squares. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 23: 195-215.

Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., 1990. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. J. Bus. Res., 21: 309-333.

TNHR., 2010. The final report on the nutritional status and habits. Ministry of Health and Hacettepe Uni., February 2014

Verbeke, W. and J. Viaene, 1999. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Qual. Pref., 10: 437-445.

Wardlaw, G.M., J.S. Hampl and R.A. DiSilvestro, 2003. Perspectives in Nutrition. 6th Edn., McGraw-Hill Higher Education New York, ISBN: 9780072921632, Pages: 752.

Zeithaml, V.A., 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Market., 52: 2-22.

Downloads

Published

15.05.2016

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Inan, S. S. T., Bayrak, E., Cebirbay, M. A., & Aktas, N. (2016). Consumers’ Meat and Products Consumption Frequency, Knowledge Levels and Quality Cues: The Sample of Aksehir, Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 15(6), 540–546. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2016.540.546