Effect of Different Levels of Dimethylacetamide (DMA) on Sperm Quality of Bangkok Rooster Chicken and Sperm Survivability in Reproductive Tract of Hen

Authors

  • Y. Laura Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Sri Harimurti Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ismaya Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.144.147

Keywords:

Bangkok chicken, frozen sperm, reproductive tract, sperm quality, survivability

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different dimethylacetamide (DMA) levels on sperm quality of Bangkok rooster chicken and sperm survivability in reproductive tract of hen. Materials and Methods: Sperm was collected from 4 Bangkok rooster chicken aged 1 year. Thirty native hens were used for insemination. Sperm from roosters was collected once a week and cryopreserved 24 h in liquid nitrogen containers at -196°C using 3% (P1), 5% (P2), 10% (P3), 14% (P4) and 18% (P5) DMA levels. Frozen thawed sperm quality was observed after thawing at 4° for 60 sec. The hens were slaughtered and sperm viability was recorded in their reproductive tract on 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after insemination. Results: The results showed that freezing decreased the sperm motility, viability and increased abnormalities. The P2 was observed to be the best DMA concentration for chicken sperm cryopreservation. Different DMA concentrations significantly (p<0.01) affected the motility, viability and abnormalities of frozen thawed sperm. Sperm motility (%) after thawing in P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 were 38.00±9.08, 46.00±8.94, 16.00±5.48, 8.00±2.24 and 1.00±2.74, respectively. Sperm viability (%) after thawing was 40.10±7.21, 53.50±12.53, 22.00±4.43, 15.30±11.40 and 12.00±3.98 in P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5, respectively. Sperm abnormalities (%) after thawing in P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 were 60.40±7.40, 41.00±3.32, 67.20±4.09, 68.20±8.58 and 71.00±11.64, respectively. In P2, spermatozoa from the hen’s reproductive tract (vagina, uterus, infundibulum and fimbria) were found motile up to 21 days after insemination. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the best DMA concentration for chicken sperm cryopreservation was 5% level in terms of sperm quality and its survivability in the reproductive tract of hen.

References

Iskandar,S., M. Rufika, H. Resmi, M. Enok and W. Endang, 2005. The effect of kinds and concentration of cryoprotectant and thawing methods on frozen semen of Arab chicken. Animal Research Centre, Bogor, Indonesia.

Pratomo, H., 2003. Preparation and characterization of polysulfone-cellulose acetate composite membranes used in ultrafiltration. J. Educ. Math. Sci., 200: 168-173.

Ahmad, S., 2005. Membrane cellulose acetate made with radiation of polymer composition, kind of solvent and concentration of additive. Chemistry Research Center, Bandung, Indonesia.

Blesbois, E., I. Grasseau and F. Seigneurin, 2005. Membrane fluidity and the ability of domestic bird spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation. Reproduction, 129: 371-378.

Madeddu, M., F. Berlinguer, V. Pasciu, S. Succu and V. Satta et al., 2010. Differences in semen freezability and intracellular ATP content between the rooster (Gallus gallus domesticus) and the Barbary partridge (Alectoris barbara). Theriogenology, 74: 1010-1018.

Partyka, A., W. Nizanski and E. Lukaszewicz, 2010. Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed fowl semen by flow cytometry. Theriogenology, 74: 1019-1027.

Blesbois, E. and J.P. Brillard, 2007. Specific features of in vivo and in vitro sperm storage in birds. Animal, 10: 1472-1481.

Tangpakdeewijit, S., S. Ponchunchoovong and T. Vongpralub, 2015. Effect of extenders on frozen semen quality of Thai native chicken (Lueng Hang Kao). Khon Kaen Agric. J., 43: 86-89.

Sood, S., I.A. Malecki, A. Tawang and G.B. Martin, 2011. Response of spermatozoa from the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) to rapid cooling, hyperosmotic conditions and dimethylacetamide (DMA). Anim. Reprod. Sci., 129: 89-95.

Brillard, J.P., O. Galut and Y. Nys, 1987. Possible causes of subfertility in hens following insemination near the time of oviposition. Br. Poult. Sci., 28: 307-318.

Takahashi, T. and M. Kawashima, 2008. Mesotocin receptor binding in oviduct uterus of the hen before and after oviposition. Poult. Sci., 87: 546-550.

Bakst, M.R. and J.S. Dymond, 2013. Artificial Insemination in Poultry. In: Success in Artificial Insemination-Quality of Semen and Diagnostics Employed, Lemma, A. (Ed.), IntechOpen, London, UK, ISBN: 978-953-51-0920-4, pp: 175-195.

Mian, A.A., B.M. Bhatti, A. Hussain and M.S. Qureshi, 1991. Fertility of hens as affected by the time of insemination. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 12: 222-225.

Sasanami, T., M. Matsuzaki, S. Mizushima and G. Hiyama, 2013. Sperm storage in the female reproductive tract in birds. J. Reprod. Dev., 59: 334-338.

Downloads

Published

15.02.2017

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Laura, Y., Harimurti, S., & Ismaya. (2017). Effect of Different Levels of Dimethylacetamide (DMA) on Sperm Quality of Bangkok Rooster Chicken and Sperm Survivability in Reproductive Tract of Hen. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 16(3), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.144.147