Comparative Analysis of Red and White Turkey Meat Quality


Authors

  • Kumarbek Amirkhanov Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Aidyn Igenbayev Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Almagul Nurgazezova Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Eleonora Okuskhanova Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Samat Kassymov Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Nazerke Muslimova Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Zhanibek Yessimbekov Department of Technology of Food and Light Industry Products, Shakarim State University of Semey, 071412 Semey, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.412.416

Keywords:

Chemical composition, essential amino acids, turkey meat, vitamin, white and red meat

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate red and white turkey meat quality in Kazakhstan by analyzing its chemical, amino acid and vitamin composition. Materials and Methods: Red and white meat was assessed from 3-4 months-old (start of the fattening period) and 6-12 months-old (end of the fattening period) turkeys (N = 10 turkeys each). Amino acid and vitamin composition was quantified with a Shimadzu LC-20 Prominence liquid chromatography system. Results: White turkey meat was found to contain 11.4-12.0% fat, while red meat contained 20.3-21.7% fat. The protein content in white meat varied between 21.4-21.7% and 18.8-19.5% in red meat. Moreover, the amino acid composition of white turkey meat was richer in essential amino acids than the red Turkey meat. After the fattening period, a slight decrease in protein (-0.7%) and increase in fat (1.4%) content was observed in both red and white turkey meat. Conclusion: The fattening period is beneficial for enriching the level of essential amino acids in white and red turkey meats.

References

Timoshenko, N.V., D.S. Shhalahov and A.A. Nesterenko, 2015. Development of raw material resources base of meat industry, forecast for the future. Molodoj Uchenyj, 5: 56-60, (In Russian).

Davleev, A.D., 2004. Mechanically deboned poultry meat. Alfa-Dizain, (In Russian).

Sokolov, A.A., D.V. Pavlov and A.S. Bolshakov, 1970. Technology of Meat and Meat Products. Pishevaya Promyshlennost, Moscow.

Essary, E.O. and S.J. Ritchey, 1968. Amino acid composition of meat removed from boned turkey carcasses by use of commercial boning machine. Poult. Sci., 47: 1953-1955.

Ahmed, T., S.A.M. Saeed and H.A. Hussien, 2013. Evaluation of poultry meat safety based on ISO 22000 as food safety management system. Pak. J. Nutr., 12: 121-129.

Biesalski, H.K., 2005. Meat as a component of a healthy diet-are there any risks or benefits if meat is avoided in the diet? Meat Sci., 70: 509-524.

Barbut, S., 2002. Poultry Meat Processing and Product Technology. Poultry Products Processing: An Industry Guide. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., pp: 1-30.

Baggio, S.R., E. Vicente and N. Bragagnolo, 2002. Cholesterol oxides, cholesterol, total lipid and fatty acid composition in turkey meat. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 5981-5986.

Alekseev, F.F., 2005. Turkey-prospect poultry meat. Ptica i Pticeprodukty, 5: 12-15, (In Russian).

Jukna, V., J. Klementaviciute, E. Meskinyte-Kausiliene, N. Peciulaitiene, M. Samborskyte and L. Ambrasunas, 2012. Comparative evaluation of quality and composition of ostrich, turkey and broiler meat. Biotechnol. Anim. Husband., 28: 385-392.

Apraksina, S.K., 2007. Poultry, poultry meat and problems of processing. Mjasnye Tehnol., 2: 56-57, (In Russian).

Antipova, L.V., A.Y. Gizatov and L.A. Zubairova, 2004. The ways of rational use of nontraditional meat with application of biotechnology treatments methods. Rational Nutr. Food Addit. Biostimulators, 3: 21-24, (In Russian).

GOST 9793-74, 2010. Meat products. Method of moisture determination. Standardinform, Moscow, 2010.

GOST R 51479-99, 2010. Meat and meat products. Method for determination of moisture content. Standardinform, Moscow, 2010.

GOST 23042-86, 2010. Meat and meat products. Method of fat determination. Standardinform, Moscow, 2010.

GOST 25011-81, 2010. Meat and meat products. Method of protein determination. Standardinform, Moscow, 2010.

R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

Kazhybayeva, G.T., B.K. Assenova, S.K. Kassymov, F.K. Smolnikova, G.N. Nurymkhan and A.N. Nurgazezova, 2012. Functional multicomponent meat products development. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of A.V. Gorbatov, Volume 5, (SP'12), Moscow, pp: 172-175.

Tcsvetkova, A.M., 2012. Formation of consumer performance of turkey meat products. Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow State University, Moscow.

Gasilina, V.A., 2012. Veterinary-sanitary expertise of commercial and backyard turkey meat from Krasnoyarsk region. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Veterinary, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Moscow.

Ivanov, S., V. Pasichniy, I. Strashynskyi, A. Marynin, O. Fursik and V. Krepak, 2014. Meat products from turkey meat with texture-forming fillers. Food Chem. Technol. (Maisto Chemija ir Technologija), 48: 25-33.

Downloads

Published

15.05.2017

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Amirkhanov, K., Igenbayev, A., Nurgazezova, A., Okuskhanova, E., Kassymov, S., Muslimova, N., & Yessimbekov, Z. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Red and White Turkey Meat Quality. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 16(6), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.412.416

Most read articles by the same author(s)