Research Article
Open Access
Introduction of Complete Ration Silage to Substitute the Conventional Ration at Traditional Dairy Farms in Lembang
Abstract
Background and Objective: Unsustainable forage supply is one of the limiting factors when providing sufficient nutrients for dairy cattle. Although silage technology has been available for years, their utilization in the traditional dairy farming community of Koperasi Peternak Susu Bandung Utara (KPSBU) Lembang has not been popular. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of collectively made Complete Ration Silage (CRS) to substitute the current ration used by the farmers. Materials and Methods: Three types of rations (R0, R1 and R2) were tested to substitute 0, 20 and 40% of the conventional ration. This experiment used 12 Friesian Holstein cows with initial conditions of 463.28±42.18 kg b.wt., 20±3.27 L daily milk and 1-3 lactation cycle(s) and 3.5±1.6 months in milk. The cows were grouped according to their initial body weight before being assigned to the treatments. The parameters observed in this experiment included the physical and fermentative characteristics of the CRS, nutrient contents, fermentability, digestibility and the intake of the rations. The impact that the rations had on the performances of the cows were observed in terms of manure score, milk production and quality, body weight gain, body condition score and technical and economical feed efficiencies. Results: The results showed that R2 produced significantly higher values (p<0.05) in fermentability, manure score and milk production compared to those produced by R0 and R1. There were no significant differences in feed intake, digestibility, milk production, BCS and feed efficiencies. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the substitution up to 40% of the conventional ration with CRS can be done to sustain a supply of high-quality nutrients for dairy cows kept by traditional farmer and will improve the competitive technical and economical efficiencies and have a positive impact on the dairy cows’ performance.
Keywords:
Completed ration silage, conventional ration, digestibility, feed efficiency, milk productionArticle Metrics
190
Abstract Views
169
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Hasanah, U., Permana, I., & Despal. (2017). Introduction of Complete Ration Silage to Substitute the Conventional Ration at Traditional Dairy Farms in Lembang. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 16(8), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.577.587
References
1.
DGLS., 2010. Livestock statistics 2010. Directorate General for Livestock Services (DGLS), Centre for Livestock Statistic Data and Information, Jakarta.
2.
Despal, I.G. Permana, T. Toharmat and D.E. Amirroennas, 2017. Pemberian Pakan Sapi Perah. IPB Press, Bogor, Indonesia.
3.
McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards and J.F.D. Greenhalgh, 2002. Animal Nutrion. 6th Edn., Longman, New York.
4.
Despal, I.G. Permana, S.N. Safarina and A.J. Tatra, 2011. Addition of water soluble carbohydrate sources prior to ensilage for ramie leaves silage qualities improvement. Media Peternakan, 34: 69-76.
5.
Ramli, N., M. Ridla, T. Toharmat and L. Abdullah, 2009. [Milk yield and milk quality of dairy cow fed silage complete ration based on selected vegetables waste as fibre sources]. J. Indon. Trop. Anim. Agric., 34: 36-41, (In Indonesian).
6.
Zahera, R., I.G. Permana and Despal, 2015. Utilization of mungbean’s green house fodder and silage in the ration for lactating dairy cows. Media Peternakan, 38: 123-131.
7.
Despal, I.G. Permana, T. Toharmat and D.E. Amirroennas, 2017. Silase Pakan Sapi Perah. IPB Press, Bogor, Indonesia.
8.
Lestari, D.A., L. Abdullah and Despal, 2015. Comparative study of milk production and feed efficiency based on farmers best practices and National Research Council. Med. Peternakan: J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 38: 110-117.
9.
Nugroho, H.D., I.G. Permana and Despal, 2015. Utilization of bioslurry on maize hydroponic fodder as a corn silage supplement on nutrient digestibility and milk production of dairy cows. Media Peternakan, 38: 70-76.
10.
Sutardi, T., 2001. Revitalisasi peternakan sapi perah melalui penggunaan ransum berbasis limbah perkebunan dan suplemen mineral organik. Laporan Penelitian Riset Unggulan Terpadu. LPPM-Institut Pertanian Bogor.
11.
Naumann, C. and R. Bassler, 1997. VDLUFA-Methodenbuch Band III, Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. 3rd Edn., VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
12.
Anonymous, 1966. General laboratory procedures. Departement of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
13.
Singleton, V.L. and J.A. Rossi, 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 16: 144-158.
14.
Idikut, L., B.A. Arikan, M. Kaplan, I. Guven, A.I. Atalay and A. Kamalak, 2009. Potential nutritive value of sweet corn as a silage crop with or without corn ear. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 734-741.
15.
NRC., 2001. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edn., The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC., USA.
16.
Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry, 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci., 18: 104-111.
17.
McDougall, E.I., 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem. J., 43: 99-109.
18.
Wells, R., 2013. Manure scoring determines supplementation needs. The Samuel Robert Nobels Foundation, News and Views, US.
19.
Lukuyu, M.N., J.P. Gibson, D.B. Savage, A.J. Duncan, F.D.N. Mujibi and A.M. Okeyo, 2016. Use of body linear measurements to estimate liveweight of crossbred dairy cattle in smallholder farms in Kenya. SpringerPlus, Vol. 5.
20.
Berry, D.P., J.M. Lee, K.A. Macdonald, K. Stafford, L. Matthews and J.R. Roche, 2007. Associations among body condition score, body weight, somatic cell count and clinical mastitis in seasonally calving dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 637-648.
21.
Linn, J., 2006. Feed efficiency: Its economic impact in lactating dairy cows. WCDS Adv. Dairy Technol., 18: 19-28.
22.
Casper, D.P. and D.R. Mertens, 2007. Feed efficiency of lactating dairy cows is related to dietary energy density. J. Dairy Sci., 90 (Suppl. 1): 407-407.
23.
IBM., 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA.
24.
Driehuis, F. and M.C. Te Giffel, 2005. Butyric Acid Bacteria Spores in whole Crop Maize Silage. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp: 271.
25.
Kaiser, E. and K. Weiß, 2005. A New System for the Evaluation of the Fermentation Quality of Silages. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningan, pp: 275.
26.
Mahlkow, K. and J. Thaysen, 2005. Effects of Two Different Chopping Lengths of Maize Silage on Silage Quality and Dairy Performance. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp: 173.
27.
Forristal, P.D. and P. O'Kiely, 2005. Update on Technologies for Producing and Feeding Silage. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp: 83-96.
28.
Moorby, J.M., N.M. Ellis and D.R. Davies, 2016. Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and corn silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 7982-7992.
29.
Keady, T.W.J., 2005. Ensiled Maize and Whole Crop wheat Forages for Beef and Dairy Cattle: Effects on Animal Performance. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp: 65-82.
30.
Nussio, L.G., 2005. Silage Production from Tropical Forages. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp: 97-107.
31.
Umiyasih, U. and E. Wina, 2008. [Processing and nutritional value of corn by-product as ruminant feed]. Wartazoa, 18: 127-136, (In Indonesian).
32.
Tarigan, A., L. Abdullah, S.P. Ginting and I.G. Permana, 2010. [Productivity, nutritional composition and in vitro digestibility of Indigofera sp. at different interval and intensity of defoliations]. JITV., 15: 188-195, (In Indonesian).
33.
Kondo, M., J. Yanagisawa, K. Kita and H. Yokota, 2005. Fermentation Characteristics of Maize/Sesbania Bi-Crop Silage. In: Silage Production and Utilization, Park, R.S. and M.D. Stronge (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp: 179.
34.
Musnandar, E., 2011. Efisiensi energi pada sapi perah holstein yang diberi berbagai imbangan rumput dan konsentrat. J. Penelitian Universitas Jambi Seri Sains, 13: 53-58.
35.
Sterk, A., B.E.O. Johansson, H.Z.H. Taweel, M. Murphy, A.M. van Vuuren, W.H. Hendriks and J. Dijkstra, 2011. Effects of forage type, forage to concentrate ratio and crushed linseed supplementation on milk fatty acid profile in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 6078-6091.
36.
McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards, J.F.D. Greenhalgh, C.A. Morgan, L.A. Sinclair and R.G. Wilkinson, 2010. Animal Nutrition. 7th Edn., Pearson Education Ltd., England.
37.
Bach, A., S. Calsamiglia and M.D. Stern, 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci., 88: E9-E21.
38.
Uhi, H.T., A. Parakkasi and B. Haryanto, 2006. Pengaruh suplemen katalitik terhadap karakteristik dan populasi mikroba rumen domba. Media Peternakan, 29: 20-26.
39.
Cherdthong, A. and M. Wanapat, 2013. Manipulation of in vitro ruminal fermentation and digestibility by dried rumen digesta. Livest. Sci., 153: 94-100.
40.
McMurphy, C.P., G.C. Duff, S.R. Sanders, S.P. Cuneo and N.K. Chirase, 2011. Effects of supplementing humates on rumen fermentation in Holstein steers. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 41: 134-140.
41.
Despal, Mubarok, M. Ridla, I.G. Permana and T. Toharmat, 2017. Substitution of concentrate by ramie (Boehmeria nivea) leaves hay or silage on digestibility of Jawarandu goat ration. Pak. J. Nutr., 16: 435-443.
42.
Jayanegara, A., A.S. Tjakradidjaja and T. Sutardi, 2006. Fermentabilitas dan kecernaan in vitro ransum limbah agroindustri yang disuplementasi kromium anorganik dan organic. Media Peternakan, 29: 54-62.
43.
Lean, I.J., H.M. Golder and M.B. Hall, 2014. Feeding, evaluating and controlling rumen function. Vet. Clin. North Am.: Food Anim. Pract., 30: 539-575.
44.
Maktabi, H., E. Ghasemi and M. Khorvash, 2016. Effects of substituting grain with forage or nonforage fiber source on growth performance, rumen fermentation and chewing activity of dairy calves. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 221: 70-78.
45.
Nasrollahi, S.M., A. Zali, G.R. Ghorbani, M.M. Shahrbabak and M.H.S. Abadi, 2017. Variability in susceptibility to acidosis among high producing mid-lactation dairy cows is associated with rumen pH, fermentation, feed intake, sorting activity and milk fat percentage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 228: 72-82.
46.
Zain, M., 2009. Substitution of native grass with ammoniated cocoa pod in sheep diet. Media Peternakan, 32: 47-52.
47.
Roche, J.R., J.M. Lee, K.A. Macdonald and D.P. Berry, 2007. Relationships among body condition score, body weight and milk production variables in pasture-based dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 3802-3815.
48.
Casper, D.P., 2008. Factors Affecting Feed Efficiency of Dairy Cows. Tri-State Dairy Nutrition. Agri-King Inc., Fulton.
