Research Article Open Access

Effect of Different Additives from Local Source on the Quality of Yoghurt

Authors

Syed Tariq Mehmood
Department of Food Technology, PMAS - Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
|
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Tariq Masud
Department of Food Technology, PMAS - Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
|
Talat Mahmood
Department of Food Technology, PMAS - Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
|
S. Maqsud
Department of Microbiology, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
DOI 10.3923/pjn.2008.695.699
PDF

Abstract

Yoghurt is the most popular fermented milk product in the most parts of world. It involves use of specific symbiotic culture of L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus. Yoghurt consists of valuable nutrients as in milk but it seems to have more than milk. In the present study different food additives from local source are used as additives and the effect is estimated for possible influence on the quality of yoghurt. Yoghurt was prepared by using different stabilizers like carboxymethyl-cellulose (CMC), guar gum, gelatin, cornstarch and their combinations like CMC-gelatin, gelatin-cornstarch and CMC-cornstarch at different levels i.e. 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5% at 0, 7, 14 and 21 day of storage interval. Guar gum at 0.1% gives best result for low acidity and low pH where as total solid free fatty acid, acetaldehyde contents comes best with the cornstarch. Food additives have influence on pH, acidity, total solid and acetaldehyde contents. During the storage of 21 days with increasing amounts of food additives, there was an increase in acidity, free fatty acids, total solid and acetaldehyde contents but decrease in pH.

Keywords:

CMC, gelatin, stabilizers, thickeners, Yoghurt quality

Article Metrics

220 Abstract Views
95 File Views
0 Downloads

Article Citation Metrics

How to Cite

Mehmood, S. T., Masud, T., Mahmood, T., & Maqsud, S. (2008). Effect of Different Additives from Local Source on the Quality of Yoghurt. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 7(5), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2008.695.699

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>