Phytochemical Screening and in vitro Antimicrobial Effect of Orange (Citrus sinensis) Ethyl Acetate Extract Silage

Authors

  • Ucop Haroen Department of Nutrition and Animal Feed Science Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Jambi University, Ma. Bulian KM 15, Mendalo Darat, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Agus Budiansyah Department of Nutrition and Animal Feed Science Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Jambi University, Ma. Bulian KM 15, Mendalo Darat, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Nelwida Department of Nutrition and Animal Feed Science Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Jambi University, Ma. Bulian KM 15, Mendalo Darat, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2018.214.218

Keywords:

Ethyl acetate, inhibitory bacteria, orange, phytochemicals, silage, waste extract

Abstract

Background and Objective: Secondary metabolites are complex compounds. Many citrus fruits contain such compounds in the skin, seeds and pulp that act as phytochemicals with bacterial growth-inhibiting, anti-fungal and anti-cancer activities. This study was designed to identify phytochemical compounds in ethyl acetate extracts of orange and assess their antibacterial activities. Methodology: An ethyl acetate extract of orange silage (EAEOS) at 250, 500, 750 and 1000 ppm was fermented for 28 days. Treatments were replicated four times. The samples were placed in a jar serving as a silo under anaerobic conditions. At the end of fermentation, phytochemical screening was performed. Data were analysed using analysis of variance under a completely randomized design. Results: The EAEOS contains alkaloid, flavonoid, steroid, triterpenoid, phenolic, saponin and coumarin compounds. The antibacterial activity of EAEOS was assessed using disc and MIC (minimum inhibition concentration) methods with Escherichia coli (E. coli ), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Salmonella typhi (S. typhi ) and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis). The extract inhibited the growth of all test organisms, with zones of inhibition ranging from 9.75±0.00 to 16.75±0.14 mm (E. coli ), 8.00±0.23 to 12.50±0.24 mm (S. aureus), 8.50±0.24 to 11.75±0.00 mm (S. typhi ) and 7.75±0.11 to 11.75±0.12 mm (B. subtilis). The MICs were 38.72±0.23 to 59.54±0.23% (E. coli ), 15.08±0.54 to 23.25±0.59% (S. aureus), 10.46±0.12 to 19.65±0.02% (S. typhi ) and 9.64±0.45 to 11.28±0.44% (B. subtilis). Conclusion: The tested EAEOS compounds exhibited inhibitory activities against both gram-positive (S. aureus, B. subtilis) and gram-negative (E. coli and S. typhi ) bacteria.

References

Ozaki, Y., S. Ayano, N. Inaba, M. Miyake, M.A. Berhow and S. Hasegawa, 1995. Limonoid glucosides in fruit, juice and processing by-products of Satsuma mandarin (Chus unshiu Marcov.). J. Food Sci., 60: 186-189.

Miller, E.G., J.J. Peacock, T.C. Bourland, S.E. Taylor, J.M. Wright, B.S. Patil and E.G. Miller, 2007. Inhibition of oral carcinogenesis by citrus flavonoids. Nutr. Cancer, 60: 69-74.

Haroen, U., Y. Marlida, Mirzah and A. Budianyah, 2013. Extraction and isolation phytochemical and antimicrobial activity of limonoid compounds from orange waste juice. Pak. J. Nutr., 12: 730-735.

Wing, J.M., 2003. Citrus feed stuffs for dairy cattle. Department of Animal Science, University of Florida, Florida, pp: 1-16. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00004764/00001.

Roy, A. and S. Saraf, 2006. Limonoids: Overview of significant bioactive triterpenes distributed in plants kingdom. Biol. Pharmaceut. Bull., 29: 191-201.

Miller, E.G., R. Fanous, F. Rivera-Hidalgo, W.H. Binnie, S. Hasegawa and L.K.T. Lam, 1989. The effects of citrus limonoids on hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 10: 1535-1537.

Si, W., J. Gong, R. Tsao, T. Zohou and H. Yu et al., 2006. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and structurally related synthetic food additives towards selected pathogenic and beneficial gut bacteria. J. Applied Microbiol., 100: 296-305.

Oluremi, O.I.A., A.D. Igyu and F.F. Abu, 2005. Response of growing Rabbit dietary replacement of maize with Sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) rind. Prod. Agric. Tech., 1: 130-136.

Oluremi, O.I.A., V.O. Ojighen and E.H. Ejembi, 2006. The nutritive potentials of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) rind in broiler production. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 613-617.

Oluremi, O.I.A., F.N. Okafor, A.Y. Adenkola and K.T. Orayaga, 2010. Effect of fermentation of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) fruit peel on its phytonutrients and the performance of broiler starter. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 546-549.

Bampidis, V.A. and P.H. Robinson, 2006. Citrus by-products as ruminant feeds: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 128: 175-217.

Agu, P.N., O.I.A. Oluremi and C.D. Tuleun, 2010. Nutritional evaluation of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) fruit peel as a feed resource in broiler production. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 684-688.

Haroen, U., Y. Marlida, Mirzah and A. Budianyah, 2016. Effect of different levels of orange (Citrus sinensis) waste juice extracts on broiler chickens performance. Pak. J. Nutr., 15: 446-449.

Ebrahimi, A., A.A.A. Qotbi, A. Seidavi, V. Laudadio and V. Tufarelli, 2013. Effect of different levels of dried sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel on broiler chickens growth performance. Archiv Tierzucht, 56: 11-17.

Arbain, D., 1995. Bioactivity test and chemical research of natural materials. Department of Pharmacy FMIPA, University of Andalas, Indonesia.

Steel, R.G.D. and H.J. Torrie, 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

Kumar, K.A., M. Narayani, A. Subanthini and M. Jayakumar, 2011. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of citrus fruit peels-utilization of fruit waste. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Tech., 3: 5414-5421.

Markham, K.R., 1988. Techniques of Flavonoid Identification. ITB Publisher, Bandung, Indonesia.

Perrin, D.D., W.I.F. Armego and D.R. Perrin, 1980. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. 2nd Edn., Pergamon Press, New York, pp: 57-63.

Long, H.H., N. Furuya, D. Kurose, M. Takeshita and Y. Takanami, 2003. Isolation of endophytic bacteria from Solanum sp. and their antibacterial activity against plant pathogenic bacteria. J. Faculty Agric. Kyushu Univ., 48: 21-28.

Harborne, J.B. and A.J. Harborne, 1998. Phytochemical Methods A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK.

Fu, S.H., M.H. Yang, H.M. Wen and J.C. Chern, 2005. Analysis of flavonoids in propolis by capillary electrophoresis. J. Food Drug Anal., 13: 43-50.

Ekwenye, U.N. and O.V. Edeha, 2010. The antibacterial activity of crude leaf extract of Citrus sinensis (Sweet orange). Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci., 1: 742-750.

Kirbaslar, F.G., A. Tavman, B. Dulger and G. Turker, 2009. Antimicrobial activity of Turkish Citrus peel oils. Pak. J. Bot., 41: 3207-3212.

Singh, A., A.R. Bilal and A. Devgun, 2009. In vitro antibiotic activity of isolated volatile oil of Citrus sinensis. Mater. Methods, 7: 1-4.

Garau, M.C., S. Simal, C. Rossello and A. Femenia, 2007. Effect of air-drying temperature on physico-chemical properties of dietary fibre and antioxidant capacity of orange (Citrus aurantium v. Canoneta) by-products. Food Chem., 104: 1014-1024.

Downloads

Published

15.04.2018

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Haroen, U., Budiansyah, A., & Nelwida. (2018). Phytochemical Screening and in vitro Antimicrobial Effect of Orange (Citrus sinensis) Ethyl Acetate Extract Silage. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 17(5), 214–218. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2018.214.218