Clinical Evaluation of Herbal Formulation for the Treatment of Intestinal Worms

Authors

  • M. Ibrahim Khan Shifa ul Mulk Memorial Hospital, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Irfanullah Siddiqui Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
  • Khan Usmanghani Shifa ul Mulk Memorial Hospital, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • E. Mohiuddin Shifa ul Mulk Memorial Hospital, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sultan Ayaz Shifa ul Mulk Memorial Hospital, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • M. Akram Shifa ul Mulk Memorial Hospital, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • S.M. Ali Shah College of Conventional Medicine, Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • H.M. Asif College of Conventional Medicine, Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2012.133.139

Keywords:

Herbal medicine, intestinal worm infestation, piperazine

Abstract

Present research work was conducted to study the clinical efficacy of coded herbal medicine Kemol in comparison with Piperazine for treatment of intestinal worm infestation. One hundred patients with intestinal worm infection were randomly assigned into two groups, 50 in each group. Test group was treated with Kemol and control group was treated with Piperazine. The effect of both drugs for treatment of intestinal worm infestation was observed before and after treatment. Comparison of data recorded by physician relating to these variables showed significant differences between test and control groups (p<0.05). The efficacy of the test treated medication (Kemol) was superior as p = 0.03. Kemol is more effective than the Piperazine in the treatment of intestinal worms.

Downloads

Published

15.01.2012

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Khan, M. I., Siddiqui, M. I., Usmanghani, K., Mohiuddin, E., Ayaz, S., Akram, M., Shah, S. A., & Asif, H. (2012). Clinical Evaluation of Herbal Formulation for the Treatment of Intestinal Worms. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 11(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2012.133.139

Most read articles by the same author(s)