Effects of Different Feed Restrictions on Kacang Goats

Authors

  • Bambang Suwignyo Faculty of Animal Science, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Zein Ahmad Baihaqi Faculty of Animal Science, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ristianto Utomo Faculty of Animal Science, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Sarmin Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Irkham Widiyono Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.236.241

Keywords:

Feed cost, feed restriction, gain, Kacang goat, re-feeding

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of different feed restrictions and refeeding on feed intake, digestibility, body weight gain and feed cost in goats. Materials and Methods: There were three treatment groups of goats had an average initial body weight of 20-25 kg. Control goats (R0) were fed 3.5% Dry Matter (DM) of body weight or underwent 1 month of feed restriction treatment (R1) and 2 months (R2) of 60% restrictions (DM base). After the restriction period, R1 and R2 groups were fed ad libitum. The variables measured include Dry Matter Intake (DMI), Organic Matter Intake (OMI), Crude Protein Intake (CPI), body weight gain, Dry Matter Digestibility (DMD), Organic Matter Digestibility (OMD), Crude Protein Digestibility (CPD) and feed cost. Data were analyzed using ANOVA based on a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) on SPSS program version 21 for windows. Results: Feed restriction had a significant effect on body weight gain, the DMI, OMI, CPI and feed cost. However, the treatments did not significantly affect body weight or DM, OM and CP digestibility. Conclusion: One month of feed restriction continued with 2 months of re-feeding (R1) can lead to compensatory growth such that the average daily gain is the highest.

References

BPS., 2015. Population in Indonesia. Central Bureau of Statistics, Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta. https://www.bps.go.id/.

Suwignyo, B., B. Suhartanto and D. Soetrisno, 2012. Perbedaan kualitas tanaman jagung berciri brown midrib resistance dari dataran rendah dan tinggi di wilayah Yogyakarta. Buana Sains, 12: 87-92.

Gatenby, R.M., 1986. Sheep Production in the Tropics and Sub-Tropics. Longman, London, Pages: 352.

Suwignyo, B., U.A. Wijaya and A. Kurniawati, 2015. Nutrient digestibility and physiology status of bligon goats males with feed restrictions. Proceedings of the International Seminar of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, September 8-9, 2015, Wenang, Manado.

Tillman, A.D., H. Hartadi, S. Reksohadiprodjo, S. Prawirokusumo and S. Lebdosoekojo, 1998. Basic of Livestock Feed Science. 6th Edn., Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Supardjo, K.G. Wiryawan, E.B. Laconi and D. Mangunwidjaja, 2011. Goat performance fed with fermented cocoa pod husk. Media Peternakan, 34: 35-41.

van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Edn., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, Pages: 476.

Orskov, E.R., 1992. Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. Harcount Brace Jovanovich, London.

Kustantinah, Z. Bachrudin and H. Hartadi, 1993. Fibrous feed evaluation on ruminant. Forum of Livestock Research Communications. Papers Collection. Department of Education and Culture. Directorate General of Higher Education. Directorate of Development and Community Service.

Cakra, I.G.L.O., I.G.M. Suwena and N.S. Sukmawati, 2005. Feed consumption and digestible nutrient coefficient on Etawah cross breed goat fed concentrate plus sodium bicarbonate. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan, 8: 1-11.

Perevolotsky, A., A. Brosh, O. Ehrlich, M. Gutman, Z. Henkin and Z. Holzer, 1993. Nutritional value of common oak (Quercus calliprinos) browse as fodder for goats: Experimental results in ecological perspective. Small Rumin. Res., 11: 95-106.

Hartadi, H., S. Reksohadiprojo and A.D. Tillman, 2005. Feed Composition Tables for Indonesia. 4th Edn., Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Suwignyo, B., L.L. Munawaroh and I.G.S. Budisatria, 2015. Effect of material and fermentation time on quality and digestibility of complete feed, average daily gain of bligon goat and farmer's income. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric., 40: 23-30.

Aryanto, B. Suwignyo and Panjono, 2013. Effect of reduction and refulfillment of feed quantity on feed intake and nutrient digestibility of Kacang and Etawah crossbred goat. Buletin Peternakan, 37: 12-18, (In Indoensian).

Anggorodi, R., 1984. Livestock Feed Science. 3rd Edn., Gramedia, Jakarta.

Mucra, D.A., 2005. Pengaruh pemakaian pod coklat sebagai pengganti jagung dalamra nstim terhadappertambahanbobotbadandan efisiensi penggunaan ransum pada sapi brahman cross. J. Peternakan, 2: 37-44.

Devendra, C. and M. Burns, 1994. Goat Production in Tropics. IDK Haryaputra, Terjemahan.

Downloads

Published

15.02.2017

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Suwignyo, B., Baihaqi, Z. A., Utomo, R., Sarmin, & Widiyono, I. (2017). Effects of Different Feed Restrictions on Kacang Goats. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 16(4), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.236.241