Research Article
Open Access
In vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Palm Oil Byproducts Which is Supplemented with Growth Factor Rumen Microbes
Abstract
The aim of this experiment was to study the use of palm oil by products [oil palm fronds (OPF), palm oil sludge (POS) and palm kernel cake (PKC)], that supplemented with Sapindus rarak and Sacharomyces cerevisiae on digestibility and fermentation in vitro. Oil Palm Fronds was previously treated with 3% urea. The treatments consist of 50% OPF+30% POS+20% PKC as a control diet (A), B = A+4% Sapindus rarak, C = A+0.5% Sacharomyces cerevisiae and D = A+4% Sapindus rarak+0.5% Sacharomyces cerevisiae. Digestibility of DM, OM, ADF, NDF, cellulose and rumen parameters (NH3 and VFA) of all treatments were significantly different (p<0.05). Product of fermentation and digestibility treatment A were significantly lower than treatments B, C and D. The result indicated that supplementation Sapindus rarak and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were able to improve fermentability and digestibility of palm oil by product.
Keywords:
Fermentation, OPF ammoniated, palm oil by product, Sacharomyces cerevisiae, Sapindus rarakArticle Metrics
200
Abstract Views
119
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Zain, M., Rahman, J., Khasrad, & Erpomen. (2015). In vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Palm Oil Byproducts Which is Supplemented with Growth Factor Rumen Microbes. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 14(9), 625–628. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2015.625.628
References
1.
Abd El-Ghani, A.A., 2004. Influence of diet supplementation with yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance of Zaraibi goats. Small Ruminant Res., 52: 223-229.
2.
AOAC., 2007. Official Method of Analysis. 18th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Gaithersburg, MD., USA.
3.
Benchaar, C., T.A. McAllister and P.Y. Chouinard, 2008. Digestion, ruminal fermentation, ciliate protozoal populations, and milk production from dairy cows fed cinnamaldehyde, Quebracho condensed tannin, or Yucca schidigera Saponin extracts. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 4765-4777.
4.
Callaway, E.S. and S.A. Martin, 1997. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J. Dairy Sci., 80: 2035-2044.
5.
Dawson, K.A., 1990. Designing the Yeast Culture of Tomorrow-Mode of Action of Yeast Culture for Ruminants and Non-Ruminants. In: Biotechnology in the Feed Industry, Lyons, T.P. (Ed.). Alltech Tech. Publ., Nicholasville KY., pp: 59-78.
6.
Chaucheyras-Durand, F. and G. Fonty, 2001. Establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and development of fermentative activities in the rumen of gnotobiotically-reared lambs receiving the microbial additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 41: 57-68.
7.
Elseed, A.M.A.F. and M.A.R. Abusamra, 2007. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat's kids. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 3: 133-137.
8.
Georing, H.K. and P.J. van Soest, 1970. Forage fibre analysis. Agricultural Hand Book No. 379, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC., USA.
9.
Grant, R.J. and D.R. Mertens, 1992. Influence of buffer pH and raw corn starch addition on in vitro fiber digestion kinetics. J. Dairy Sci., 75: 2762-2768.
10.
Guedes, C.M., D. Goncalves, M.A.M. Rodrigues and A. Dias-da-Silva, 2007. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fibre degradation of maize silages in cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 145: 27-40.
11.
Herawaty, R., N. Jamarun, M. Zain, Arnim and R.W.S. Ningrat, 2013. Effect of supplementation Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Leucaena leucocephala on low quality roughage feed in beef cattle diet. Pak. J. Nutr., 12: 182-184.
12.
Kopecny, J. and R.J. Wallace, 1982. Cellular location and some properties of proteolytic enzymes of rumen bacteria. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 43: 1026-1033.
13.
Lynch, H.A. and S.A. Martin, 2002. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture and Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 2603-2608.
14.
Martin, S.A. and D.J. Nisbet, 1992. Effect of direct-fed microbials on rumen microbial fermentation. J. Dairy Sci., 75: 1736-1744.
15.
Marghany, M., M.A. Sarhan, A. Abd. El-Hey and A.A.H. El-Tahan, 2005. Peformance of lactating buffaloes fed rations supplemented with different level s of baker's yeast (Sacharomyces cerevisiae). Egypt. J. Nutr. Feed, 8: 21-34.
16.
Mathieu, F., J.P. Jouany, J. Senaud, J. Bohatier, G. Berthin and M. Mercier, 1996. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; protozoal and probiotic interactions. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 36: 271-287.
17.
Michalet-Doreau, B. and D. Morand, 1996. Effect of yeast culture, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, on ruminal fermentation during adaptation to high-concentrate feeding. Ann. Zootech., 45: 337-337.
18.
Miller-Webster, T., W.H. Hoover, M. Holt and J.E. Nocek, 2002. Influence of yeast culture on ruminal microbial metabolism in continuous culture. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 2009-2014.
19.
Newbold, C.J., P.E.V. Williams, N. Mckain, A. Walker and R.J. Wallace, 1990. The effects of yeast culture on yeast numbers and fermentation in the rumen of sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 49: 47-47.
20.
Newbold, C.J., R.J. Wallace, X.B. Chen and F.M. McIntosh, 1995. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 1811-1818.
21.
Newbold, C.J., S.M. El Hassan, J. Wang, M.E. Ortega and R.J. Wallace, 1997. Influence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity of rumen protozoa and bacteria. Br. J. Nutr., 78: 237-249.
22.
Oshio, S., O. Abu Hassan, A. Takigawa, D. Mohd. Jaafar, A. Abe, I. Dahlan and N. Nakanishi, 1990. Processing and utilization of oil palm by-products for ruminants. MARDI/TARC @ JIRCAS Collaborative Study Report, pp: 110.
23.
Paryad, A. and M. Rashidi, 2009. Effect of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention of tomato pomace in sheep. Pak. J. Nutr., 8: 273-278.
24.
Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedure of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, USA.
25.
Tang, S.X., G.O. Tayo, Z.L. Tan, Z.H. Sun and L.X. Shen et al., 2008. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws. J. Anim. Sci., 86: 1164-1172.
26.
Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry, 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci., 18: 104-111.
27.
Wallace, R.J., 1994. Ruminal microbiology, biotechnology and ruminant nutrition: Progress and problems. J. Anim. Sci., 72: 2992-3003.
28.
Zain, M., T. Sutardi, Suryahadi and N. Ramli, 2008. Effect of defaunation and supplementation methionine hydroxy analogue and branched chain amino acid in growing sheep diet based on palm press fiber ammoniated. Pak. J. Nutr., 7: 813-816.
29.
Zain, M., N. Jamarun, A. Arnim, R.W.S. Ningrat and R. Herawati, 2011. Effect of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on fermentability, microbial population and digestibility of low quality roughage in vitro. Arch. Zootech., 14: 51-58.
30.
Zain, M., J. Rahman and Khasrad, 2014. Effect of palm oil by products on in vitro fermentation and nutrient digestibility. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., 14: 175-181.
